rsFzYIGeYi
Principal jailed for ten years with the heavy sentence on the grounds of appeal, the second instance court yesterday, prosecutors believe that the first instance the facts are clear, appropriate sentencing request upheld
Yangcheng Evening News reporter Shen Ting reports: Shenzhen police bribery violations revocation order online pursuit, leading to long-term escape a criminal case concern. When three police incident, some have been promoted, some district deputies, some "pursuit model", but deliberately harboring fugitives, the case is the first instance verdict principal Ye Mouxiong ten years in prison, but the sentencing judge had considered heavy, appealed, March 21 afternoon, the case in Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court hearing.
Fugitives charged 120,http://www.grunen.com,000 yuan commissions
Three outstanding performance of the police, but favoritism. Things dating back to January 2007, Bao'an District, Shenzhen City Industrial Zone Street second large armed robbery occurred, the victim Moumou robbed property worth 1.3 million yuan.
After the incident, the Shenzhen Municipal Public Security Bureau set up a task force to conduct Xixiang police investigation, the deputy director of the police station when he was accused xixiang Doumou Hao command, Xixiang police station when he was the person in charge of the case investigation team defendant Yemou male hosting. A total of 12 people under criminal detention case,woolrich outlet cadriano, the principal Peng Moumou (handled separately), and suspected stolen goods suspect Moumou et al fugitive task force Peng, Li et al., Handled the online pursuit procedures.
In June 2007, by others to find Doumou Hao Moumou request Doumou Hao help revoke its online pursuit measure. In July 2007, when Doumou Hao find any Baoan, Shenzhen City Public Security Bureau Branch Bureau of Interpol Battalion comprehensive help police the defendant Lee,tiffany chiave, Lee knowingly Doumou Hao Failing to submit relevant evidence,nike air max one pas cher,http://kitsoft.belovonet.ru, does not meet the online pursuit handle revocation conditions still apply for help Doumou Hao Moumou online pursuit of revocation of the registration entry. Thanks for Lee,spaccio woolrich bologna orari,http://www.ttcplt.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=148580, Doumou Hao gave 4,000 yuan commissions.
In July 2008, through a friend request Yemou Xiong Peng Moumou online pursuit of measures to help revocation thereof. Ye Mouxiong find Doumou Hao help handle the matter,http://sportsfan.jpn.org/cgi-kban/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=191&page=1, Dou Mouhao agreed. Yemou Xiong Peng Moumou twice accepting 120,000 yuan and 60,000 yuan to Doumou Hao come from. Doumou Hao Lee again find help, Lee knowingly does not comply with the relevant procedures still apply for help Doumou Hao Peng Moumou online pursuit of revocation of the registration entry. This time, Lee also got a 4000 yuan commissions.
Police arrested three suspects before the incident
Peng Moumou accomplices were in 2008,tiffany milano indirizzo, 2010 was sentenced to ten years,nike air max 90 femme pas cher, Peng Moumou was revoked because online pursuit of measures have been large. Until August 2012, Peng Moumou on suspicion of illegal detention of others, was arrested. After the incident, the defendant Doumou Hao surrendered, and a true account of facts of the crime, constitute a surrender. Has arrested three people at the end of 2012. Yantian District People's Procuratorate of the case by the prosecution in July 2013. Three defendants returned all the money.
Ye Mouxiong Court of First Instance sentenced the accused guilty of accepting bribes and sentenced to ten years imprisonment, confiscation of personal property 20,000 yuan. Defendant Doumou Hao bribes, sentenced to one year and eight months, confiscation of personal property 10,000 yuan,moncler torino, guilty of favoritism and sentenced to six months. Graft decided to implement two years imprisonment, confiscation of personal property 10,000 yuan. Lee defendant guilty of favoritism and sentenced to seven months.
Three defendants outstanding job performance
According to media reports, the police station when the incident Xixiang original case investigation team captain Big Wave Longhua District has been promoted to deputy director of the police station. And when the crime occurred, as deputy director of the police station Xixiang, then tune founding director of the police station. When the case of the incident, he was promoted to deputy level cadres, was transferred to the Shenzhen Municipal Public Security Bureau, a core sector hold important positions, or Bao'an District People's Congress. Yangcheng Evening News reporter found, in the July 23, 2013 in Bao'an District of Shenzhen City Fifth People's Congress, the report on behalf of the Credentials and changes in circumstances regarding five deputies to resign from district to district People's Congress office is accepted, imprisoned him,moncler junior, political life to an end.
While involved in Bao'an police brigade police bureau Lee is being publicly elected "Pursuit experts." According to media reports,bologna woolrich, Lee in 2004 to join the police force after graduating from Baoan Public Security University, for many years rooted forensic line, and gradually grow into pursuit experts Shenzhen Public Security Criminal Investigation System. Lee involved in the development of the two fugitives mining clues to solve the system of more than 2,http://wx.jazzsynth.com/wxcgi/kizai/sunkizai.cgi?mode=form&no=70&page=2,000 pieces, hand-wanted fugitives arrested more than 120 nationwide. Because of outstanding achievements, he has four times by the city Public Security Bureau, Public Security Bureau Bao'an awards,hogan macerata, has twice been named the outstanding civil servants, in 2007 the city was awarded a large training Interpol personal information third, in 2009, was awarded the province's public security organs' chase escape pacesetter "honorary title, in 2011 has been named" My favorite Bao'an police. "
The appellant believes its heavy sentence
As appellant, Yemou Xiong said he had voluntarily surrendered themselves, and the first comprehensive account of other accomplices included criminal acts of favoritism,woolrich usato, discipline inspection departments for investigation before the conversation,http://www.californiagreensolutions.com, it has explained the facts of the crime unit leaders, is surrendered. Secondly, in the first instance proceedings, the prosecutor did not explicitly accused of accepting bribes to change to change,marchio woolrich,http://www.177bike.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=587003, the Full Court also did not inform the change you want to be a misdemeanor crime of favoritism judgment for felony bribery, it did not lead to an effective defense.
In addition,http://www.ingc.jp, the appellant considers that it has no jobs online pursuit operation revocation powers and duties, there is no application form to fill in online pursuit of revocation revocation start online pursuit procedures. And that the "120,000 yuan" bribes, there are 40,000 yuan source of evidence is not sufficient.
In this case, the first instance verdict against two other defendants are in prison for two years and seven months, and sentenced to ten years imprisonment for the appellant, the appellant believes this sentence was manifestly excessive.
Yesterday the trial of Ye Mouxiong have voluntarily surrendered themselves plea, prosecutors believe it does not meet voluntarily surrender and truthfully indictment two points. The prosecutor said it had referred to the unit in charge of discipline inspection commission of accountable leadership bribes episode confessions. But prosecutors said that the first instance court had said that the name of the leadership did not hear Ye Mouxiong clearly relevant facts.
In addition, the prosecutor noted, Ye Mouxiong in the third only to the relevant departments confessed he received 120,000 yuan, and Ye Mouxiong explain things is the fact that investigators have mastered. Prosecutors believe that Ye Mouxiong not reached voluntarily surrendered themselves. Prosecutors believe the first instance the facts are clear, appropriate sentencing request upheld.
(Original title: collect 120,000 commission three "excellent" police revoke Order online pursuit jailed)
